Trade volume

Trade value

Gross emissions from soy deforestation exposure

Net emissions from soy deforestation exposure

Soy area

Soy deforestation exposure

Tiago Reis

Yan Prada Moro

Connecting exports of Brazilian soy to deforestation

Brazil is the world’s largest soy producer and exporter. In 2021, it produced almost 

 was exported as 82% raw soybeans, 16% soybean cake and 2% soybean oil. Soy was Brazil’s second largest export, accounting for 

 and generating an annual revenue of almost 

Total deforestation and conversion of native vegetation across Brazil increased from 1.6 million hectares (Mha) in 2018 to 1.84 Mha in 2019 and 1.83 Mha in 2020. The expansion of soy plantations is the 

second largest direct driver of deforestation

 and conversion, after the expansion of pasture for cattle farming and 

Trase data shows the amount of soy deforestation and land conversion

 decreased from 743,000 hectares (ha) in 2018 to 686,000 ha in 2019 and 562,000 ha in 2020, while the total area of soy planted increased from 34.8 Mha in 2018 to 35.9 Mha in 2019 and 37.2 Mha in 2020.

This suggests a weakening of soy as a direct driver of deforestation and conversion, with most expansion occurring on former cattle pastures, although soy expansion still likely plays a key indirect role in driving further deforestation by displacing expansion of pastures. Of the 37.2 Mha of soy planted in 2020, 

. This percentage increases if we look further back.

The decline in soy-driven deforestation could be put at risk by future demand for soy. Since 2019, the price of soy has increased due to demand for soy-based animal feed from China, increasing global food prices and Russia’s war in Ukraine. Soy prices in 2022 have stabilised but remain high, potentially incentivising further deforestation and conversion to expand soy plantations.

While soy plantations have expanded most in the Cerrado and were associated with 355,000 ha of recent deforestation in 2019 and 264,000 ha in 2020 – an area almost twice the size of the city of São Paulo – Trase data reveals that the Pampas is also a particularly active frontier for the conversion of natural vegetation for soy. In 2019, 228,000 ha of soy was harvested in areas recently deforested and converted in the Pampas. In 2020, the figure was 196,000 ha. For comparison, soy production in the Amazon in 2019 was linked to 77,600 ha of recent deforestation and in 2020 soy production in 2020 was linked to 76,400 ha of recent deforestation.

The municipalities of São Gabriel and Dom Pedrito in southern Brazil’s Rio Grande do Sul had 17,600 and 12,800 ha respectively of soy deforestation in areas of native Pampas, placing them in the top-five municipalities with the highest soy deforestation in 2020 alongside Feliz Natal in Mato Grosso, Uruçuí in Piauí, and Santana do Livramento, also in Rio Grande do Sul.

The Pampas biome is an area rich in native grasslands which makes it suitable for cattle grazing. In 2020, each tonne of soy produced in the Pampas was linked to the clearance of over 10 times as much natural vegetation as a tonne from the Cerrado.

Although only 4% of Brazil’s soy deforestation in 2020 occurred in the Atlantic Rainforest (23,600 ha), this is of particular concern as it has been 

 since 2006. In the UK, new legislation will prevent the use of commodities unless they were 

produced in compliance with ‘relevant local laws’

The Cerrado and Pampas are active hotspots of soy deforestation and conversion in 2019-2020

draft regulation requiring mandatory due diligence

 on imports of certain agricultural commodities, including soy from Brazil, to prohibit products grown on land deforested after a cut-off date (likely to be the end of 2019 or later). The regulation would establish a risk assessment system to identify and categorise the ‘high’, ‘low’ or ‘standard’ risk regions within producer countries.

Trase data shows that in 2020, just 309 of a total of 2,388 soy-producing municipalities accounted for 95% of Brazil’s soy deforestation (between 2015 and 2019). These municipalities represented 51% of Brazil’s soy production in 2020 (62 million tonnes) and 49% of exports (41 million tonnes).

This means that 2,079 soy-producing municipalities in Brazil, representing 49% of production (59.6 million tonnes) and 51% of exports (42.7 million tonnes), have negligible levels of deforestation and conversion risk. 

, the EU’s risk-based approach to due diligence could focus regulatory efforts where they are most needed, while lowering the cost of compliance for exports from low-risk areas.

EU draft regulations create challenges and opportunities for Brazilian soy producers

The large, established traders – Bunge, Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland – continue to be the most exposed to deforestation and conversion from exports of Brazilian soy, although they all show a decreasing trend in 2018-2020. This might be attributed to companies’ efforts to clean their supply chains or to the stabilisation of some agricultural regions, where less soy-suitable lands with remaining native vegetation are available.

 since 2017, Singapore-based Olam Group is now among the top five traders linked to soy deforestation and conversion, together with Gavilon.

Traders with the highest soy deforestation exposure

China continues to be by far the largest importer of soy deforestation and conversion from Brazil, continuing an upward trend which began in 2013. In 2020, China’s imports were linked to 229,000 ha of soy deforestation, followed by Brazil’s own domestic consumption at 102,000 ha. China’s per-tonne deforestation exposure in 2020 is the second highest after Portugal and closely followed by Brazil’s own domestic consumption.

The EU’s soy deforestation exposure decreased from 56,100 ha in 2018 to 29,800 in 2020, much lower than 2015 when it peaked at 201,000 ha. This figure reflects an overall declining trend, but also a shift in sourcing patterns in favour of regions with less recent deforestation and conversion. Portugal stands out as the EU country of first import with the highest intensity of exposure to deforestation per tonne of imported soy.

China has the largest soy deforestation and conversion exposure

By 2020, 133,000 ha of deforestation linked to soy production had taken place over the previous decade in areas of the Amazon which were supposed to have been protected by the Soy Moratorium since 2008. The Moratorium is a voluntary zero-deforestation commitment signed by 25 companies that are members of trade associations 

, and that together account for about 95% of soy produced in the Amazon.

These companies have made similar individual zero-deforestation commitments that cover other areas such as the Cerrado. In total, ZDCs covered about 50% of Brazil’s soy exports in 2020.

The fact that half of Brazil’s soy exports are not covered by ZDCs and that deforestation is still rampant in the Amazon and Cerrado more than a decade after they were signed highlights the limitations of the voluntary approach, and that policymakers may need to consider regulatory measures and ways to strengthen enforcement.

This experience also casts doubt on the prospects of traders achieving their 

, which was announced at the COP27 climate conference in November 2022, to limit carbon emissions from land-use change.

Zero-deforestation commitments fail to protect the Amazon and Cerrado

Clearing carbon-rich forests, grasslands and other natural ecosystems and replacing them with soy fields releases greenhouse gases (measured as the equivalent of carbon dioxide) that drive climate change.

Brazilian soy deforestation and conversion linked to the 2020 harvest resulted in the release of 28 million tonnes of carbon from native vegetation, equivalent to 103 million tonnes of CO₂ – 11% of the 

country's total land use change annual emissions

. Soy replaced three times as much native vegetation in the Cerrado as the Amazon – but emissions from land clearance were at the same levels for both biomes. In 2020 there was 133,000 ha of soy in the Amazon planted on land deforested after the 2008 Soy Moratorium cut-off date. This deforestation was linked to 69 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions.

To reference this article, please use the following citation: Reis, T., & Prada Moro, Y. (2022). Connecting exports of Brazilian soy to deforestation. Trase. 

A detailed explanation of Trase’s methodology is available at: 

SEI-PCS Brazil soy v2.6 supply chain map: Data sources and methods

Carbon emissions from soy-driven deforestation and conversion

Martin Persson

Chandrakant Singh

Osvaldo Pereira

Helen Bellfield

DeDuCE: New data to inform action against commodity-driven deforestation

James Richens

Brazil soy supply chain

Brazil soy data highlights

top 5 Companies
By deforestation exposure (2020)

top 5 Regions
By deforestation exposure (2020)

top 5 Importing Countries
By deforestation exposure (2020)

Explore Brazil soy data

Brazil soy open data and methods

Brazil soy latest insights

DeDuCE: New data to inform action against commodity-driven deforestation

Trase and AdAstra: Powering action on carbon emissions from land conversion

Traceability is not a silver bullet for reducing deforestation

Doubts over legal compliance put Brazil’s soy exports to the EU at risk

Brazil soy supply chain

Brazil soy data highlights

top 5 CompaniesBy deforestation exposure (2020)

top 5 RegionsBy deforestation exposure (2020)

top 5 Importing CountriesBy deforestation exposure (2020)

Explore Brazil soy data

Brazil soy open data and methods

Brazil soy latest insights

DeDuCE: New data to inform action against commodity-driven deforestation

Trase and AdAstra: Powering action on carbon emissions from land conversion

Traceability is not a silver bullet for reducing deforestation

Doubts over legal compliance put Brazil’s soy exports to the EU at risk

top 5 Companies
By deforestation exposure (2020)

top 5 Regions
By deforestation exposure (2020)

top 5 Importing Countries
By deforestation exposure (2020)